Components of a PKI, Part 3: Certificate Revocation

Preface: Components of a PKI

Public key infrastructure (PKI) is a core technology in the identity and security stack. This technology uses encryption to allow entities such as an individual or device to be uniquely identifiable and able to store or transmit information securely. All modern organizations use PKI in some form or another. The digital certificate on a website that protects customers’ privacy and data is an example of PKI in action.

Fortunately, the fundamentals haven’t changed significantly since PKI was formally introduced in the X.509 standard in 1988. In this five-part blog series, we cover a few of the most important PKI components:

  1. Digital Certificates
  2. Certificate Authorities and CA Hierarchies
  3. Certificate Revocation
  4. Active Directory Certificate Services
  5. Hardware Security Modules

Part 3: Certificate Revocation

One important function of Certificate Authorities (CAs—also known as Certification Authorities) that’s mentioned briefly in Part 2 of our “Components of a PKI” blog series is the ability to perform certificate revocation, or the CA’s ability to revoke certificates it issued previously. For example, if an attacker compromises a code signing certificate and is signing malicious executables on behalf of an organization, the ability to revoke the rogue code signing certificate is important to trusting the CA.

Not all CAs implement revocation checking, nor do all clients enforce revocation checking. Certain use cases such as network authentication (EAP-TLS) or smart card logon are intended to be stricter with revocation checking.

What Is a Certificate Revocation List?

A Certificate Revocation List (CRL) is a digitally signed record of all certificates that have been revoked by a CA. The CRL is published in a location that all clients (both subscribers or entities authenticating subscribers) would be able to retrieve, such as a web server or an LDAP container.

Due to the nature of certificate revocation checking, CRLs are supported only for HTTP and cannot be served via HTTPS. Chain building would fail when attempting to access a URI that requires revocation checking as well. Since the CRL is digitally signed, clients have assurance that the CRL was published by the CA regardless of communication over untrusted or hostile networks. Without compromising the CA’s private key, it would be computationally unfeasible to generate a CRL on behalf of a CA.

When a certificate is revoked from the CA, the next CRL published by the CA will include the serial number, revocation date, and CRL reason code of the revoked certificate. Figure 1 shows an example.

Figure 1 Published Certificate Revocation List

How Are Certificate Revocation Lists Configured on Certificates?

When we discussed the anatomy of a certificate in Part 1 of our “Components of a PKI” blog series, you may have noticed that the certificate was configured with two URIs in the CRL Distribution Point (CDP) extension, as Figure 2 shows. If this field isn’t present on a certificate, then the CA hasn’t implemented CRL revocation checking.

Figure 2 CDP extension on

When a CA is configured, the CDP extension is used to populate the URIs of CDPs on issued certificates. Figure 3 shows an example of configuring the CDP extension on a Microsoft Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS) Enterprise CA. (For more information about AD CS, see Part 4 of this blog series.)

Figure 3 Configuring CDP extension on Enterprise CA

What Is OCSP?

One of the major limitations of CRLs is that the files will become extremely large in environments with substantial certificate issuance and revocation. The size of the CRL can impact performance for bandwidth-limited clients such as mobile devices. By the end of 1999, Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) was formally introduced in RFC 2560 as an alternative to the traditional method of using CRLs for determining revocation status.

OCSP relies on implementing OCSP responders, which are web servers from which clients can request the revocation status of individual issued certificates during certificate verification. The client will submit a certificate serial number to the OCSP responder, and the OCSP responder provides a digitally signed response confirming the revocation status.

OCSP responses are a fixed size on the network, and most modern clients (e.g., your cell phone) will attempt to communicate to the OCSP responder before verifying the CRL. In a scenario in which both OCSP and CRL are configured on a certificate and OCSP is offline, the client will fail the authentication.

Figure 4 illustrates the architecture of CRL/OCSP revocation checking with the following steps:

  1. CA digitally signs a CRL with the CA’s private key and publishes it to the CRL web server.
  2. CA issues an OCSP signing certificate to the OCSP web server.
  3. OCSP web server downloads the CRL periodically to have the latest revocation status information available for any OCSP clients.
  4. CA issues a client certificate that includes the CRL and OCSP URIs.
  5. Client downloads the digitally signed CRL from the CRL web server and checks if the issued certificate’s serial number is revoked.
  6. Client sends a signed OCSP request with the issued certificate’s serial number to the OCSP server.
  7. OCSP server returns a signed OCSP response with the issued certificate’s revocation status back to the client.
Figure 4 Example of CRL and OCSP revocation checking behavior

How Is OCSP Configured on Certificates?

When we discussed the anatomy of a certificate in Part 1 of our “Components of a PKI” blog series, you may have also noticed that the certificate was configured with a single OCSP URI in the Authority Information Access (AIA) extension, as Figure 5 shows. If this field isn’t present on a certificate, then the CA hasn’t implemented CRL revocation checking.

Figure 5 AIA extension for OCSP on

When a CA is configured, the AIA extension is used to populate the OCSP URIs on issued certificates. Figure 6 shows an example of configuring the AIA extension on a Microsoft AD CS Enterprise CA. (For more information about AD CS, see Part 4 of this blog series.) As you can see in Figure 5 (see “[2]Authority Info Access”) and Figure 6 (see “Include in the AIA extension of issued certificates”), the AIA extension is also used to publish the issuer certificate for clients to be able to automatically build the certificate chain if the issuer certificates aren’t present on their device.

Figure 6 Configuring AIA extension for OCSP on Enterprise CA

Final Remarks

Certificate revocation is often the most overlooked aspect of an organization’s PKI solution. Implementing certificate revocation isn’t necessary in all situations and comes with the responsibility of having a reliable revocation publishing infrastructure. (Note that an expired or unreachable Certificate Revocation List will prevent the client from authenticating successfully.) Revocation checking may be required for organizations that authorize access to a corporate identity or network with their internal PKI certificates. If you aren’t sure whether your PKI is implementing certificate revocation correctly, Ravenswood Technology can help. Contact our team today!

Read more in Part 4 of this blog series: Active Directory Certificate Services.


Remediating LDAP Client Security

Remediating LDAP security issues is important because the default configurations on domain controllers (DCs) and clients are open to various attacks. Learn how to remediate those issues.

Monitoring for LDAP Client Security

Applications that use Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) are prevalent in virtually every organization that uses Active Directory (AD). Unfortunately, the default AD configuration provides

A Farewell to Viral Tenants

Microsoft announced that after October 31, 2021, viral Azure Active Directory tenants would no longer be created for B2B collaboration.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.